CrashOverride
Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are assessment reports for different malware threats which have been collected and analyzed by our research team. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards evaluate and rank threats using several metrics including real-world and potential risk factors, trends, frequency, prevalence, and persistence. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are updated regularly based on our research data and metrics and are useful for a wide range of computer users, from end users seeking solutions to remove malware from their systems to security experts analyzing threats.
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards display a variety of useful information, including:
Popularity Rank: The ranking of a particular threat in EnigmaSoft’s Threat Database.
Severity Level: The determined severity level of an object, represented numerically, based on our risk modeling process and research, as explained in our Threat Assessment Criteria.
Infected Computers: The number of confirmed and suspected cases of a particular threat detected on infected computers as reported by SpyHunter.
See also Threat Assessment Criteria.
| Threat Level: | 80 % (High) |
| Infected Computers: | 9 |
| First Seen: | February 16, 2025 |
| Last Seen: | October 25, 2025 |
| OS(es) Affected: | Windows |
CrashOverride is a malware that gained notoriety because it was used to take down the power grid in Ukraine. The CrashOverride attack that happened in December managed to take down Kiev's power capacity down to 20%. PC security researchers have received reports that this attack may have been a test for larger scale attacks. As of today, the CrashOverride malware is the most sophisticated form of malware designed to sabotage power grids that has been observed.
Table of Contents
A Secretive Malware that can Cause a Huge Damage
CrashOverride was built to target physical systems deliberately and is only the second of its kind, the first being Stuxnet, which gained notoriety in its attacks against Iranian nuclear facilities in 2009. CrashOverride is designed to be able to adapt to different electric facilities and, if applied in the right way, could cause much more damage and outages than was observed in Kiev in December. The potential of CrashOverride as a tool for carrying out large-scale attacks is huge and still unexplored. Regretfully there is nothing unique about Ukraine as a target for these attacks. There is nothing that could prevent the cybercrooks or hostile states from using CrashOverride to target other countries in these attacks.
How the CrashOverride Attack Works
The CrashOverride attack is particularly harmful because it is automated. In previous examples of these attacks, the cybercrooks will gain attention to the target's system and then switch off power on electrical substations manually. However, in the case of CrashOverride, the program interacts with the equipment on the electrical grid directly, using the protocols used by these machines to send commands and shut down equipment quickly. This means that CrashOverride can be used to perform attacks faster, requires fewer people to carry out the attack, and can be performed with less preparation. The CrashOverride attack, in its current form, shows that this attack can be scaled quite effectively, being used to take down more targets. Earlier attacks would require more than 20 people just to target 2 or 3 different electrical facilities. In this form, CrashOverride can enable 20 people to target up to 15 different sites at once, or more if there is enough time to carry out the attack. CrashOverride can be programmed and automated, which means that it can be used to maximize the effects of the attack. One additional aspect of CrashOverride that is especially worrying for PC security researchers is that this malware can be customized to run without feedback, meaning that CrashOverride can run without being connected to the Internet or receiving inputs from its controllers. CrashOverride can deliver one of four different payloads in its attacks, which can be adapted depending on the protocols being used in the targeted power grid.
CrashOverride’s Potential to Cause Physical Damage
One worrying aspect of CrashOverride is that if it is deployed in the right way, it can be used to cause physical damage to the targeted equipment. For example, CrashOverride can be used to exploit a vulnerability in certain relays that can prevent circuit breakers from operating correctly, causing meltdowns, short circuits, and other possible physical damage, which may even result in fires and other harmful consequences. These attacks can be customized to cause cascades, where one attack can result in additional effects occurring throughout a power grid.
The Possibilities of a CrashOverride Attack
The timing of CrashOverride attacks coincided with Russia's invasion of Crimea and had been linked to state-sponsored groups, much like the Stuxnet attacks on Iran were clearly sponsored by the United States government. One worrying aspect of CrashOverride is that malware researchers suspect that the CrashOverride malware can be adapted to target other high-profile targets and utilities, such as gas, water and computer networks.
Analysis Report
General information
| Family Name: | Trojan.MSIL.Taskun.LG |
|---|---|
| Signature status: | Hash Mismatch |
Known Samples
Known Samples
This section lists other file samples believed to be associated with this family.|
MD5:
82a9120b4f58be5364de43ad1eccc086
SHA1:
28379bc75f9ffb8068ba024fe9cacf9d4a2529a4
SHA256:
AB19A47C467B01D4448B65943295DF650072B477FAF8C5A4E56B3A0E94B3A367
File Size:
696.87 KB, 696872 bytes
|
Windows Portable Executable Attributes
- File doesn't have "Rich" header
- File doesn't have exports table
- File is .NET application
- File is 32-bit executable
- File is either console or GUI application
- File is GUI application (IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_WINDOWS_GUI)
- File is not packed
- IMAGE_FILE_DLL is not set inside PE header (Executable)
- IMAGE_FILE_EXECUTABLE_IMAGE is set inside PE header (Executable Image)
Windows PE Version Information
Windows PE Version Information
This section displays values and attributes that have been set in the Windows file version information data structure for samples within this family. To mislead users, malware actors often add fake version information mimicking legitimate software.| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Assembly Version | 1.0.0.0 |
| File Description | Killing |
| File Version | 1.0.0.0 |
| Internal Name | Killing.exe |
| Legal Copyright | Copyright © 2025 |
| Original Filename | Killing.exe |
| Product Name | Killing |
| Product Version | 1.0.0.0 |
Digital Signatures
Digital Signatures
This section lists digital signatures that are attached to samples within this family. When analyzing and verifying digital signatures, it is important to confirm that the signature’s root authority is a well-known and trustworthy entity and that the status of the signature is good. Malware is often signed with non-trustworthy “Self Signed” digital signatures (which can be easily created by a malware author with no verification). Malware may also be signed by legitimate signatures that have an invalid status, and by signatures from questionable root authorities with fake or misleading “Signer” names.| Signer | Root | Status |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corporation | DigiCert Trusted G4 Code Signing RSA4096 SHA384 2021 CA1 | Hash Mismatch |
File Traits
- .NET
- HighEntropy
- x86
Block Information
Block Information
During analysis, EnigmaSoft breaks file samples into logical blocks for classification and comparison with other samples. Blocks can be used to generate malware detection rules and to group file samples into families based on shared source code, functionality and other distinguishing attributes and characteristics. This section lists a summary of this block data, as well as its classification by EnigmaSoft. A visual representation of the block data is also displayed, where available.| Total Blocks: | 7 |
|---|---|
| Potentially Malicious Blocks: | 5 |
| Whitelisted Blocks: | 2 |
| Unknown Blocks: | 0 |
Visual Map
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
Similar Families
Similar Families
This section lists other families that share similarities with this family, based on EnigmaSoft’s analysis. Many malware families are created from the same malware toolkits and use the same packing and encryption techniques but uniquely extend functionality. Similar families may also share source code, attributes, icons, subcomponents, compromised and/or invalid digital signatures, and network characteristics. Researchers leverage these similarities to rapidly and effectively triage file samples and extend malware detection rules.- MSIL.Taskun.BE
- MSIL.Taskun.LG
Windows API Usage
Windows API Usage
This section lists Windows API calls that are used by the samples in this family. Windows API usage analysis is a valuable tool that can help identify malicious activity, such as keylogging, security privilege escalation, data encryption, data exfiltration, interference with antivirus software, and network request manipulation.| Category | API |
|---|---|
| User Data Access |
|
| Process Terminate |
|