Threat Database Rogue Websites

Threat Scorecard

Ranking: 15,893
Threat Level: 20 % (Normal)
Infected Computers: 5
First Seen: September 19, 2023
Last Seen: September 27, 2023
OS(es) Affected: Windows

Upon a thorough examination conducted by cybersecurity experts, it was revealed that the primary objective of the website is to employ deceptive tactics aimed at convincing visitors that their computers are under threat or compromised. This is indicative of an insidious intent, as the website engages in practices that intentionally mislead and frighten users regarding the security of their devices.

Additionally, makes requests for permission to send notifications to the user's browser. This is a concerning feature because it can be exploited to deliver unwanted and potentially harmful notifications, advertisements or even further deceptive content. Granting such permission can lead to an influx of intrusive and unwanted pop-ups or notifications.

Rogue Sites Like often Rely on Fake Scares

When users visit the website, they are confronted with a fabricated security alert message designed to deceive and manipulate them. This false message wrongly asserts that the user has recently visited an illicit and infected website that contained illegal content. Furthermore, it falsely claims that as a consequence of this visit, the user's computer is now exposed to potential virus infections.

The primary objective behind this deceptive message displayed on is to create a sense of urgency and anxiety among users. The intention is to manipulate users into taking certain actions that ultimately serve the interests of fraud-related actors who are responsible for the creation and operation of the website.

The fake security alerts displayed on impersonate a message originating from McAfee Total Protection, a reputable security software provider. This deceptive tactic is aimed at generating profits for the affiliates involved in this scheme. These affiliates stand to earn commissions by persuading users to download or purchase software through their affiliate links.

Additionally, seeks permission from users to display notifications. Granting this permission would give the website the ability to inundate users with a barrage of questionable pop-up notifications. These notifications can include dubious offers, fake security alerts and potentially harmful advertisements.

Sites are Incapable of Performing Security Scans of Users' Devices

Websites are generally incapable of performing comprehensive security scans of users' devices due to several fundamental limitations:

Access Restrictions: Websites operate within a user's Web browser, and for security and privacy reasons, Web browsers have strict restrictions on what websites can access on a user's device. Websites are isolated from the underlying operating system and cannot directly access or scan files, software or system settings on the user's device.

Limited Browser Capabilities: Web browsers are designed primarily for rendering Web content and executing Web-based scripts. They lack the deep-level access and permissions required to scan and analyze files, processes, or system configurations on the user's device. This represents a protective measure to prevent fraudulent websites from compromising user data and devices.

Privacy and Security Concerns: Allowing websites to perform security scans of user devices would pose significant privacy and security risks. It could potentially expose sensitive user data and system vulnerabilities to fraud-related actors if not properly regulated and secured. To protect user privacy and security, Web browsers deliberately restrict the actions websites can take.

Resource Limitations: Conducting comprehensive security scans of a user's device is a resource-intensive process that typically requires specialized software and administrative-level access. Websites, running within a Web browser, lack the resources and permissions needed to perform such scans effectively.

Legal and Ethical Considerations: Scanning a user's device without explicit consent and proper legal authorization would likely violate privacy laws and regulations in many jurisdictions. Ethically and legally, it is unacceptable for websites to perform invasive scans without the user's knowledge and consent.

User Consent and Control: Any legitimate security scan should require user consent and should be initiated by a trusted security application, not a website. Users should have control over when and how their devices are scanned for security threats, and this should be conducted through dedicated security software or system tools.

In summary, websites lack the technical capabilities, permissions, and resources to perform comprehensive security scans of users' devices. Such scans would raise serious privacy and security concerns, potentially violate laws and regulations, and are best left to dedicated security applications and tools that operate at the system level with proper user consent and oversight.

URLs may call the following URLs:


Most Viewed