Browser Touch
Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are assessment reports for different malware threats which have been collected and analyzed by our research team. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards evaluate and rank threats using several metrics including real-world and potential risk factors, trends, frequency, prevalence, and persistence. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are updated regularly based on our research data and metrics and are useful for a wide range of computer users, from end users seeking solutions to remove malware from their systems to security experts analyzing threats.
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards display a variety of useful information, including:
Popularity Rank: The ranking of a particular threat in EnigmaSoft’s Threat Database.
Severity Level: The determined severity level of an object, represented numerically, based on our risk modeling process and research, as explained in our Threat Assessment Criteria.
Infected Computers: The number of confirmed and suspected cases of a particular threat detected on infected computers as reported by SpyHunter.
See also Threat Assessment Criteria.
| Popularity Rank: | 3,403 |
| Threat Level: | 80 % (High) |
| Infected Computers: | 123,010 |
| First Seen: | December 28, 2015 |
| Last Seen: | August 18, 2026 |
| OS(es) Affected: | Windows |
Computer users that got affected by the Browser Touch adware will be presented with numerous advertisements that may appear on the Web pages they want to visit. The reason for these advertisements is that the developers of adware can make a good profit when computer users click on these advertisements or by increasing the traffic to sponsored websites. The advertisements displayed by Browser Touch may attract computer users because the adware may keep their activities under observation and collect data that will allow its sponsors to exhibit relevant content. Browser Touch may affect various Web browsers including Opera, Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome and Internet Explorer. Browser Touch advertisements may present themselves as banners, coupons and deals. Due to the large amount of advertisements, the computer's performance may be affected, and your machine may become slow and irresponsive. Security researchers recommend the immediate removal of Browser Touch to avoid further problems and stop the unwanted advertisements displayed by it.
Table of Contents
Analysis Report
General information
| Family Name: | Trojan.ClipBanker.J |
|---|---|
| Signature status: | Root Not Trusted |
Known Samples
Known Samples
This section lists other file samples believed to be associated with this family.|
MD5:
7ed167e3ec373aec3ce7f0f4c8ecd1f2
SHA1:
1f1e6c0473400e2835db2349f1d9d7efa74c9378
SHA256:
B7CCD809E51B9A23E7ECD54C3E6A35267CD94F6E24F5DCB0721E38FF03CE1EA3
File Size:
5.04 MB, 5038256 bytes
|
|
MD5:
0d9c1f0a9419a6d1e03b8a7b7663bb74
SHA1:
972f4a07433bc9a63e7a2c7b6155e13a6c8c12d9
SHA256:
2938227F06A1B8456946E26D700EE19EA04093EC617F725180D320ABC59A9687
File Size:
2.11 MB, 2112008 bytes
|
Windows Portable Executable Attributes
- File doesn't have "Rich" header
- File doesn't have debug information
- File doesn't have exports table
- File doesn't have relocations information
- File has TLS information
- File is 32-bit executable
- File is either console or GUI application
- File is GUI application (IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_WINDOWS_GUI)
- File is Native application (NOT .NET application)
- File is not packed
Show More
- IMAGE_FILE_DLL is not set inside PE header (Executable)
- IMAGE_FILE_EXECUTABLE_IMAGE is set inside PE header (Executable Image)
File Icons
File Icons
This section displays icon resources found within family samples. Malware often replicates icons commonly associated with legitimate software to mislead users into believing the malware is safe.
Windows PE Version Information
Windows PE Version Information
This section displays values and attributes that have been set in the Windows file version information data structure for samples within this family. To mislead users, malware actors often add fake version information mimicking legitimate software.| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Company Name |
|
| File Description |
|
| File Version |
|
| Internal Name |
|
| Legal Copyright |
|
| Original Filename |
|
| Product Name |
|
| Product Version |
|
Digital Signatures
Digital Signatures
This section lists digital signatures that are attached to samples within this family. When analyzing and verifying digital signatures, it is important to confirm that the signature’s root authority is a well-known and trustworthy entity and that the status of the signature is good. Malware is often signed with non-trustworthy “Self Signed” digital signatures (which can be easily created by a malware author with no verification). Malware may also be signed by legitimate signatures that have an invalid status, and by signatures from questionable root authorities with fake or misleading “Signer” names.| Signer | Root | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 3DP | Sectigo Public Code Signing Root R46 | Root Not Trusted |
| Interezen. Co.,Ltd | Sectigo Public Code Signing Root R46 | Root Not Trusted |
File Traits
- 2+ executable sections
- HighEntropy
- x86
Block Information
Block Information
During analysis, EnigmaSoft breaks file samples into logical blocks for classification and comparison with other samples. Blocks can be used to generate malware detection rules and to group file samples into families based on shared source code, functionality and other distinguishing attributes and characteristics. This section lists a summary of this block data, as well as its classification by EnigmaSoft. A visual representation of the block data is also displayed, where available.| Total Blocks: | 4 |
|---|---|
| Potentially Malicious Blocks: | 0 |
| Whitelisted Blocks: | 1 |
| Unknown Blocks: | 3 |
Visual Map
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
Windows API Usage
Windows API Usage
This section lists Windows API calls that are used by the samples in this family. Windows API usage analysis is a valuable tool that can help identify malicious activity, such as keylogging, security privilege escalation, data encryption, data exfiltration, interference with antivirus software, and network request manipulation.| Category | API |
|---|---|
| Anti Debug |
|
| User Data Access |
|
