Trojan.MSIL.Krypt.GEB
Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are assessment reports for different malware threats which have been collected and analyzed by our research team. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards evaluate and rank threats using several metrics including real-world and potential risk factors, trends, frequency, prevalence, and persistence. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are updated regularly based on our research data and metrics and are useful for a wide range of computer users, from end users seeking solutions to remove malware from their systems to security experts analyzing threats.
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards display a variety of useful information, including:
Popularity Rank: The ranking of a particular threat in EnigmaSoft’s Threat Database.
Severity Level: The determined severity level of an object, represented numerically, based on our risk modeling process and research, as explained in our Threat Assessment Criteria.
Infected Computers: The number of confirmed and suspected cases of a particular threat detected on infected computers as reported by SpyHunter.
See also Threat Assessment Criteria.
| Popularity Rank: | 9,602 |
| Threat Level: | 80 % (High) |
| Infected Computers: | 1,142 |
| First Seen: | January 3, 2013 |
| Last Seen: | December 18, 2025 |
| OS(es) Affected: | Windows |
Table of Contents
Analysis Report
General information
| Family Name: | Trojan.MSIL.Krypt.GEB |
|---|---|
| Signature status: | No Signature |
Known Samples
Known Samples
This section lists other file samples believed to be associated with this family.|
MD5:
77a2d69f73888e7488561a37cf015aab
SHA1:
15ad113b51a38f1b2992f059c54f024576b4ee99
SHA256:
F28CC710F6E172666962FFEE386CD50EE1C6C72A443196169C5C49942BE246AC
File Size:
1.44 MB, 1444848 bytes
|
|
MD5:
d7d95ff408557557abe1f2a105032d16
SHA1:
b7821ebc96fe912979a6ec2aaaa9b22a57065f0b
SHA256:
2BB0788FCA447F84B4D0ACB4D33762F185C974DC4455940B4F2CB890630A1413
File Size:
780.80 KB, 780800 bytes
|
|
MD5:
2cca38bce58e904282b2237bae1c4549
SHA1:
1410b15e49836200fce283e4aa32680c4655f561
SHA256:
56886F3D393781D750846A0C623B492435BB7CC5DA29242318C7CCDE87D93F44
File Size:
624.13 KB, 624128 bytes
|
|
MD5:
579232ceb4ad133378a7a2bad23a80e9
SHA1:
129bf9fd98f295cec4396aac8dae68c58fb57157
SHA256:
583E850F8350430E70C729BB7C566CD36C9BF50D5574FA66C6D34D3E08E76DEF
File Size:
1.27 MB, 1270784 bytes
|
Windows Portable Executable Attributes
- File doesn't have "Rich" header
- File doesn't have debug information
- File doesn't have exports table
- File doesn't have security information
- File is .NET application
- File is 32-bit executable
- File is 64-bit executable
- File is either console or GUI application
- File is GUI application (IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_WINDOWS_GUI)
- File is not packed
Show More
- IMAGE_FILE_DLL is not set inside PE header (Executable)
- IMAGE_FILE_EXECUTABLE_IMAGE is set inside PE header (Executable Image)
File Icons
File Icons
This section displays icon resources found within family samples. Malware often replicates icons commonly associated with legitimate software to mislead users into believing the malware is safe.
Windows PE Version Information
Windows PE Version Information
This section displays values and attributes that have been set in the Windows file version information data structure for samples within this family. To mislead users, malware actors often add fake version information mimicking legitimate software.| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Assembly Version |
|
| Comments |
|
| Company Name |
|
| File Description |
|
| File Version |
|
| Internal Name |
|
| Legal Copyright |
|
| Legal Trademarks | HRID-NDT Ltd., Zagreb - Croatia |
| Original Filename |
|
| Product Name |
|
| Product Version |
|
Digital Signatures
Digital Signatures
This section lists digital signatures that are attached to samples within this family. When analyzing and verifying digital signatures, it is important to confirm that the signature’s root authority is a well-known and trustworthy entity and that the status of the signature is good. Malware is often signed with non-trustworthy “Self Signed” digital signatures (which can be easily created by a malware author with no verification). Malware may also be signed by legitimate signatures that have an invalid status, and by signatures from questionable root authorities with fake or misleading “Signer” names.| Signer | Root | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Vision Quest Virtual LLC | SSL.com EV Code Signing Intermediate CA RSA R3 | Self Signed |
File Traits
- .NET
- HighEntropy
- msil.krypt
- RijndaelManaged
- x64
- x86
Block Information
Block Information
During analysis, EnigmaSoft breaks file samples into logical blocks for classification and comparison with other samples. Blocks can be used to generate malware detection rules and to group file samples into families based on shared source code, functionality and other distinguishing attributes and characteristics. This section lists a summary of this block data, as well as its classification by EnigmaSoft. A visual representation of the block data is also displayed, where available.| Total Blocks: | 664 |
|---|---|
| Potentially Malicious Blocks: | 4 |
| Whitelisted Blocks: | 329 |
| Unknown Blocks: | 331 |
Visual Map
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
x
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0 - Probable Safe Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
Windows API Usage
Windows API Usage
This section lists Windows API calls that are used by the samples in this family. Windows API usage analysis is a valuable tool that can help identify malicious activity, such as keylogging, security privilege escalation, data encryption, data exfiltration, interference with antivirus software, and network request manipulation.| Category | API |
|---|---|
| User Data Access |
|
| Encryption Used |
|
| Syscall Use |
Show More
|
