Trojan.Kryptik.EDHDV
Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are assessment reports for different malware threats which have been collected and analyzed by our research team. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards evaluate and rank threats using several metrics including real-world and potential risk factors, trends, frequency, prevalence, and persistence. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are updated regularly based on our research data and metrics and are useful for a wide range of computer users, from end users seeking solutions to remove malware from their systems to security experts analyzing threats.
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards display a variety of useful information, including:
Popularity Rank: The ranking of a particular threat in EnigmaSoft’s Threat Database.
Severity Level: The determined severity level of an object, represented numerically, based on our risk modeling process and research, as explained in our Threat Assessment Criteria.
Infected Computers: The number of confirmed and suspected cases of a particular threat detected on infected computers as reported by SpyHunter.
See also Threat Assessment Criteria.
| Popularity Rank: | 25,638 |
| Threat Level: | 80 % (High) |
| Infected Computers: | 6 |
| First Seen: | December 7, 2023 |
| Last Seen: | December 3, 2025 |
| OS(es) Affected: | Windows |
Table of Contents
Analysis Report
General information
| Family Name: | Trojan.Kryptik.EDHDV |
|---|---|
| Signature status: | Hash Mismatch |
Known Samples
Known Samples
This section lists other file samples believed to be associated with this family.|
MD5:
ad5a867207591f4174045278f17faf72
SHA1:
b052746d86db317308926eec1cf5513b3411ecce
SHA256:
4E37D961641C49BA61E733A0D4E96C7808E2A4B43838CECC4A33C809FE1B7B44
File Size:
7.87 MB, 7869008 bytes
|
|
MD5:
4bf4649ded2a20e3488984d95afefadf
SHA1:
44209c1bd1e762a4bb7812db6d5a6ebc59e5adcb
SHA256:
C38F0A03AD1CC1DBAC9F00E07838065BF7225308B16EB5D3C84AAD6D29F1EF7F
File Size:
7.83 MB, 7832112 bytes
|
Windows Portable Executable Attributes
- File doesn't have "Rich" header
- File doesn't have debug information
- File doesn't have exports table
- File has TLS information
- File is 64-bit executable
- File is either console or GUI application
- File is GUI application (IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_WINDOWS_GUI)
- File is Native application (NOT .NET application)
- File is not packed
- IMAGE_FILE_DLL is not set inside PE header (Executable)
Show More
- IMAGE_FILE_EXECUTABLE_IMAGE is set inside PE header (Executable Image)
File Icons
File Icons
This section displays icon resources found within family samples. Malware often replicates icons commonly associated with legitimate software to mislead users into believing the malware is safe.
Windows PE Version Information
Windows PE Version Information
This section displays values and attributes that have been set in the Windows file version information data structure for samples within this family. To mislead users, malware actors often add fake version information mimicking legitimate software.| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Company Name | Microsoft Corporation |
| File Description | WMI Provider Host |
| File Version | 10.0.26100.3323 (WinBuild.160101.0800) |
| Internal Name | Wmiprvse.exe |
| Legal Copyright | © Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. |
| Original Filename | Wmiprvse.exe |
| Product Name | Microsoft® Windows® Operating System |
| Product Version | 10.0.26100.3323 |
Digital Signatures
Digital Signatures
This section lists digital signatures that are attached to samples within this family. When analyzing and verifying digital signatures, it is important to confirm that the signature’s root authority is a well-known and trustworthy entity and that the status of the signature is good. Malware is often signed with non-trustworthy “Self Signed” digital signatures (which can be easily created by a malware author with no verification). Malware may also be signed by legitimate signatures that have an invalid status, and by signatures from questionable root authorities with fake or misleading “Signer” names.| Signer | Root | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Surfshark B.V. | GlobalSign Code Signing Root R45 | Hash Mismatch |
| Martin Tofall | Sectigo Public Code Signing Root R46 | Hash Mismatch |
File Traits
- 2+ executable sections
- HighEntropy
- vmp section variant
- x64
Block Information
Block Information
During analysis, EnigmaSoft breaks file samples into logical blocks for classification and comparison with other samples. Blocks can be used to generate malware detection rules and to group file samples into families based on shared source code, functionality and other distinguishing attributes and characteristics. This section lists a summary of this block data, as well as its classification by EnigmaSoft. A visual representation of the block data is also displayed, where available.| Total Blocks: | 1,980 |
|---|---|
| Potentially Malicious Blocks: | 172 |
| Whitelisted Blocks: | 447 |
| Unknown Blocks: | 1,361 |
Visual Map
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
x
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
x
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
x
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
x
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
0
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
x
?
x
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
x
0
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
x
0
0
?
x
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
x
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
x
?
0
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
x
0
0
?
x
0
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
x
?
0
?
?
x
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
x
0
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
0
?
x
x
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
x
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
x
x
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
x
x
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
0
x
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
x
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
x
x
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
x
?
x
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
x
0
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
x
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
x
0
x
0
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
x
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
x
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
x
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
x
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
x
?
0
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
x
x
?
0
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
x
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
0
x
0
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
x
0
?
?
x
x
?
?
?
0
0
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
0
0
?
0
0
?
0
0
x
?
?
x
0
x
0
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
0
?
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
?
?
x
0
0
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
x
0
?
?
x
?
0
0
0
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
x
?
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
x
?
?
?
0
?
x
0
x
?
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
x
0
?
x
?
?
?
x
?
?
x
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
x
?
?
?
0
x
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
x
?
?
?
?
x
?
x
?
0
?
x
x
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
x
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
x
x
?
?
0
?
0
x
?
0
0
?
x
0
0 - Probable Safe Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
Windows API Usage
Windows API Usage
This section lists Windows API calls that are used by the samples in this family. Windows API usage analysis is a valuable tool that can help identify malicious activity, such as keylogging, security privilege escalation, data encryption, data exfiltration, interference with antivirus software, and network request manipulation.| Category | API |
|---|---|
| Syscall Use |
|
