PUP.Elemental
Table of Contents
Analysis Report
General information
| Family Name: | PUP.Elemental |
|---|---|
| Signature status: | Root Not Trusted |
Known Samples
Known Samples
This section lists other file samples believed to be associated with this family.|
MD5:
fbb8be3aa7105238955b724120cd32a9
SHA1:
6836e973869781fa41585286eba5cbf2a7b1338b
SHA256:
0A33C7A87D8B89899767299760435B9473DFA6FDBEF8DCC79E5281B4D07DF2E7
File Size:
303.10 KB, 303096 bytes
|
Windows Portable Executable Attributes
- File doesn't have "Rich" header
- File doesn't have exports table
- File is 32-bit executable
- File is either console or GUI application
- File is GUI application (IMAGE_SUBSYSTEM_WINDOWS_GUI)
- File is Native application (NOT .NET application)
- File is not packed
- IMAGE_FILE_DLL is not set inside PE header (Executable)
- IMAGE_FILE_EXECUTABLE_IMAGE is set inside PE header (Executable Image)
File Icons
File Icons
This section displays icon resources found within family samples. Malware often replicates icons commonly associated with legitimate software to mislead users into believing the malware is safe.Windows PE Version Information
Windows PE Version Information
This section displays values and attributes that have been set in the Windows file version information data structure for samples within this family. To mislead users, malware actors often add fake version information mimicking legitimate software.| Name | Value |
|---|---|
| Company Name | Elements Browser |
| File Description | Elements Browser Setup |
| File Version | 1.0.0.1 |
| Internal Name | ElementsSetup.exe |
| Legal Copyright | Copyright (C) 2017 |
| Original Filename | Elementa.exe |
| Product Name | Elements Browser |
| Product Version | 1.0.0.1 |
Digital Signatures
Digital Signatures
This section lists digital signatures that are attached to samples within this family. When analyzing and verifying digital signatures, it is important to confirm that the signature’s root authority is a well-known and trustworthy entity and that the status of the signature is good. Malware is often signed with non-trustworthy “Self Signed” digital signatures (which can be easily created by a malware author with no verification). Malware may also be signed by legitimate signatures that have an invalid status, and by signatures from questionable root authorities with fake or misleading “Signer” names.| Signer | Root | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Info Software | COMODO RSA Certification Authority | Root Not Trusted |
Block Information
Block Information
During analysis, EnigmaSoft breaks file samples into logical blocks for classification and comparison with other samples. Blocks can be used to generate malware detection rules and to group file samples into families based on shared source code, functionality and other distinguishing attributes and characteristics. This section lists a summary of this block data, as well as its classification by EnigmaSoft. A visual representation of the block data is also displayed, where available.| Total Blocks: | 695 |
|---|---|
| Potentially Malicious Blocks: | 12 |
| Whitelisted Blocks: | 580 |
| Unknown Blocks: | 103 |
Visual Map
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
x
?
?
0
?
?
0
x
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
?
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
0
0
?
0
?
?
0
?
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
x
0
0
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
0
?
?
0
?
?
?
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
?
?
0
0
?
?
0
0
x
0
0
0
?
0
?
x
0
0
x
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
x
0
0
x
x
0
x
x
?
x
?
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
?
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 - Probable Safe Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
? - Unknown Block
x - Potentially Malicious Block
Windows API Usage
Windows API Usage
This section lists Windows API calls that are used by the samples in this family. Windows API usage analysis is a valuable tool that can help identify malicious activity, such as keylogging, security privilege escalation, data encryption, data exfiltration, interference with antivirus software, and network request manipulation.| Category | API |
|---|---|
| Network Wininet |
|
| Network Winhttp |
|