Gastronomy Tab Browser Extension
Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecard
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are assessment reports for different malware threats which have been collected and analyzed by our research team. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards evaluate and rank threats using several metrics including real-world and potential risk factors, trends, frequency, prevalence, and persistence. EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards are updated regularly based on our research data and metrics and are useful for a wide range of computer users, from end users seeking solutions to remove malware from their systems to security experts analyzing threats.
EnigmaSoft Threat Scorecards display a variety of useful information, including:
Ranking: The ranking of a particular threat in EnigmaSoft’s Threat Database.
Severity Level: The determined severity level of an object, represented numerically, based on our risk modeling process and research, as explained in our Threat Assessment Criteria.
Infected Computers: The number of confirmed and suspected cases of a particular threat detected on infected computers as reported by SpyHunter.
See also Threat Assessment Criteria.
| Ranking: | 5,857 |
| Threat Level: | 50 % (Medium) |
| Infected Computers: | 85 |
| First Seen: | May 16, 2023 |
| Last Seen: | September 30, 2023 |
| OS(es) Affected: | Windows |
After a thorough evaluation of the Gastronomy Tab browser extension, it was discovered that it functions as a browser hijacker. The intrusive application is specifically designed to promote a fake search engine known as find.hsrcnav.com. Gastronomy Tab manipulates browser settings to assert control over the user's browsing experience. This type of unwanted software is typically downloaded and installed by users inadvertently, without their knowledge or intention, as they may be unaware of the hidden functionality and potentially deceptive nature of browser-hijacking applications.
The Gastronomy Tab Exhibits the Intrusive Characteristics of a Browser Hijacker
Once installed, the Gastronomy Tab initiates alterations to specific settings, such as the users' Web browser's homepage, default search engine and new tab page. It replaces these settings with a counterfeit search engine known as find.hsrcnav.com. Consequently, when users perform searches using this deceptive search engine, they are redirected to bing.com, where search results from the legitimate search engine Bing are presented.
It is necessary to point out that while the search results themselves originate from Bing, the Gastronomy Tab is the culprit behind the hijacking of the user's browsing experience and the modification of its behavior.
Furthermore, it is crucial to recognize that fake search engines and browser hijackers often engage in the collection and tracking of user data. This includes monitoring browsing patterns, recording search queries, and potentially accessing personal information. The harvested data can be exploited or sold to third parties, posing risks to user privacy and potentially resulting in identity theft or targeted advertising.
Removing certain browser hijackers can prove to be a challenging task. These intrusive applications may leave behind residual files, modify system settings, or possess the ability to reinstall themselves, making manual elimination cumbersome and ineffective.
Browser Hijackers and PUPs (Potentially Unwanted Programs) are Rarely Installed Intentionally
Browser hijackers and PUPs are often designed to deceive users by presenting themselves as legitimate or useful software. They may claim to enhance browsing experience, provide useful features, or offer valuable services. Users may be enticed to install them based on false promises or misleading information.
The distribution methods employed by browser hijackers and PUPs are often deceptive as well. They are frequently bundled with other software that users intentionally download from untrusted or questionable sources. These bundled installations may have pre-selected checkboxes or hidden disclosures that go unnoticed by users during the installation process. As a result, users inadvertently end up installing unwanted programs along with the desired software.
Furthermore, browser hijackers and PUPs often utilize aggressive or intrusive tactics to gain unauthorized access to users' systems. They may exploit vulnerabilities in outdated software or use social engineering tricks to induce users into granting permissions. For example, they may masquerade as necessary system updates or security tools, leading users to install them unknowingly.
Moreover, the consequences of housing browser hijackers and PUPs are typically negative for users. These programs can alter browser settings, redirect searches, flood browsers with unwanted advertisements, track user activities, and compromise privacy and security. Once users realize the negative impact on their browsing experience, they often seek to remove these unwanted programs.
Overall, the deceptive tactics employed by browser hijackers and PUPs, coupled with users' lack of awareness about their true nature, make it rare for users to install them intentionally. The hidden or misleading nature of these programs, along with their negative effects, contribute to users unintentionally falling victim to their installation.
